
Republican congressmen Lou Bareletta [who recently voted to defund Planned Parenthood, shame on him] and Tom Marino from Pennsylvania visited King's College for an event called "Congress on Campus." I learned about this event on the same day it happened and simply had to attend! I have had various qualms with Barletta and have displayed concerns about him in previous blog posts here and here and in December of 2009, he made a comment about the nativity scene that I filed a complaint against and had taken down because it was unconstitutional:
I don’t believe we are singling out any one religion. There is the menorah. There is the Nativity scene for the Christians and for the non-believers there is also nothing there. I don’t think the city is singling out one faith. I think they are all represented on the lawn,” he said.
Obviously, I'm no Barletta fan and no fan of republicans in general.
I brought my notepad and pencil to the event hoping to write some memorable quotes and was quite successful. My original intention and main objective was to ask Lou Barletta to clarify his statement made concerning the nativity scene, but unfortunately, the question was not selected out of the pool of index cards.
The event brought out people of all ages and intentions including King's College students who showed up for extra credit, elderly members of the community, King's College staff, local media, and others. The event was televised and presumably will be or is online somewhere. I'll link the discussion soon to verify my claims and criticisms of both candidates (It may be here).
Lou and Tom told their "American Dream" stories going from "rags to riches" and Tom mentioned that he was here through the good grace of the Lord. Great. Whatever. It's what you'll expect from these congressmen. The problem I see, though, is that republicans can tell their stories, but little that they do benefits the middle class. Republicans generally love tax cuts and exemptions for the rich while the middle class suffers.
Lou and Tom constantly noted that we have a huge deficit and that "there is nowhere to get the money from," but they somehow overlook taxation of the rich and corporations... I caught the first major spin from Barletta when he spoke of all the spending of previous presidents and noted that Obama spent more in 18 months than they did in all of their terms (but somehow forgot about Bush Jr.) Also, what about the other months in the Obama presidency and the fact that he inherited a flawed system from other presidents and has to "undo" Bush.
Marino mentioned that there was NO discussion with republicans regarding the healthcare bill that he so lovingly called "Obamacare," but this isn't the case because democrats have modified provisions in the healthcare bill due to republicans' input. Unfortunately, the discussions were not as transparent as Obama claimed in his campaigning [live on C-SPAN open to everyone], but republicans' complaints obviously swayed the bill because Obama wanted republicans to hop on board with the bill. Obama also directly invited republicans to have a conversation.
If I recall correctly, Marino mentioned China about two or three times throughout the discussion and made them look like an enemy nation that wants to destroy us. He said that China's military is growing and this is a domestic concern. Wow. I don't follow this... Our relations with China seem to be quite positive after Obama met with the president of China. He also said that China steals our ideas and patents.
Marino discussed the price of gas and oil and stressed that we need to end our dependency on foreign oil because, he claimed, we get most of our oil from hostile foreign countries. I knew that Marino was wrong about this one because it's a common ploy from republicans that I have noticed quite often in the past. Most of our oil comes from Canada! Also, if we end our dependancy on forgeign oil from hostile countries (Canada is our friend, last I checked), we won't be rescued by some night in shining armor. The Washington Post does a great job with this myth.
Marino furthered his discussion on hostile foreign countries by invoking the crisis in Egypt. He approved of Obama's handling of the Egypt situation and mentioned that "Mumbarak should not be thrown under the bus." Then, in quite a turn, he made a Glenn-Beckessque link of nonsense with no chalk or board with some wild assertions.
The Muslim Brotherhood is a branch of Al-Queda. (false)
We can't even afford to let them in the door and let them have power.
They want to get into Parliament.
Once they get into Parliament, they take over Egypt.
Once they get in power, we have an "Iran situation."
This doesn't work at all. First, the Brotherhood has been banned from running as a group and just because some individuals get in (if they are voted for) does not mean that they will take over. The president and many other officials will certainly have a say...
Barletta has to answer various questions about his stance of illegal immigration as I expected. He told some anecdotal stories about how an illegal immigrant in his town murdered someone and how a 14-year-old illegal immigrant shot a gun at a playground. Because of this and Barletta's desire to keep illegal immigrants out [he says that crimes from illegals drains the budget, illegal workers harm the economy, and illegals hurt legals the most, etc.], he felt that "enough was enough" and he was soon in the national spotlight. Lou was careful to mention that it's not fair to group all illegals together and portray them as problems and that we should never confuse illegals with legals (I'm not sure what that means), but it's not very clear that Barletta follows his own advice. There may be much more (and there probably is) to Lou's fervor for making illegal immigration a key issue, but to be fair, the time he had to speak was very limited.
Marino discussed social security and claimed that the government owes 2.4 trillion dollars to this fund. This is very false unless, somehow, I'm grossly mistaken. Social Security has quite a surplus.
On the Tea Party, one of the best and worst quotes from the night was made by Marino, "The Tea Party is the quintessential example of democracy." This almost provokes barfing. The "leaders(?)" of the Tea Party greatly distort history, don't believe in the separation of church and state, think that the founding fathers were against a centralized federal government, and despite their claims of small government, want big government concerned with the uteruses of women.
Finally, the wildest claim of the night award goes to Tom Marino when he said that Iraq and Kuwait should pay reparations to the United States for us helping them. Wow. I'm still waiting to hear about the happy troves of people in streets coming out to embrace the soldiers and go on live TV to do so. Apparently, the media is quite busy with other matters? We did much more harm to the Middle East and our reputation by going in than we helped.
Tom Marino makes Lou Baretta look like a liberal.
I thank King's College and the various sponsors who hosted this event. It was quite the educational experience and I was happy to attend and learn something about my local representatives.
In addition to my reporting, local newspapers also cover the event:
"Marino discussed the price of gas and oil and stressed that we need to end our dependency on foreign oil because, he claimed, we get most of our oil from hostile foreign countries."
ReplyDeleteOK, fine. Now let's see him push for sustainable and renewable energy that is cleaner than oil, increased MPG ratings for vehicles, etc. Or, does he think we can just magically make oil appear for our use that doesn't come from other countries?
Do you have a life or do you just think about this shit all day long?
ReplyDeleteI think people like you and religious watchdog groups are fucking pathetic. Get a life and concentrate on something important. You are actually infringing on people's First Amendment rights to practice religion by opening your mouth. I don't understand why you focus on this stuff so much. Maybe if you got a real job, you wouldn't have to ask for donations on your blog.
I know that by commenting this I will only fuel your fire of how people hate you. "I'm the most hated person in Wilkes Barre." that was you once quoted in the newspaper after you called the ACLU about the nativity scene. I think you should leave the elderly alone because they love religion and let them have their nativity. I saw a older woman cry outside the courthouse after they took down the nativity.
By expressing that I know this will only fuel your fire, I am no longer going to not say how I feel. You are ridiculous. You will never be famous only infamous and nothing is good about that. Even Michael Moore listens to the other side of the story, you just critcize.
I will end with this. May God Bless You and Keep You.
From the author of this blog (for some reason, I can't log in to my openid!)
ReplyDeleteI really love people like you, previous poster. Instead of offering any argument on any of my 100+ blog posts, you simply send hate and offer personal attacks. Your fallacious assumption that I don't have a life is hilarious because I'm a fourth year college student, have two jobs, am quite involved with many activities and leadership roles.
How, exactly, are I depriving people of the freedom to worship by arguing that their religious ideas are false?
I never said that I was the most hated person I Wilkes-Barre. KRZ DJ Jumpin' Jeff Walker called me the third most hated person in Luzerne County. I wear this as a great badge of honor because it proves my point on so many levels. This demonstrates that religion is divisive as I have argued it is, moderates can be hateful people and part of the problem, people can turn their brains off when religion is involved, people lack critical thinking skills, and religion can do a great deal of harm. The nativity issue was a legal one, not a religious one. The arguments were and still are on my side and the courthouse officials even admitted they were wrong!
What do you mean "Leave the elderly alone?" All I am doing is upholding the law and voicing my opinions in the media, online, etc. I'm not knocking on doors handing out papers to people or anything like that. How can a dissenting opinion that is civil bother people so much if their beliefs are so substantiated, anyway? They should follow the advice in the Bible (1 Peter 3:15) and give arguments for their beliefs. How can a dissenter be such a bother in the face of God, if he exists?
I welcome disagreement on my blog, on my profile, and everywhere. If you don't agree, say so and dictate why. We can have a conversation instead of offering personal attacks, non-sequiters, etc.
It's also silly to suggest that I don't listen to the other side of the story because I listen (and post) debates from "the other side" and go to various religiously-themed events, and discuss these matters with other people frequently.
Thanks for brightening my day and proving my point!
From the author of this blog (for some reason, I can't log in to my openid!)
ReplyDeleteI really love people like you, previous poster. Instead of offering any argument on any of my 100+ blog posts, you simply send hate and offer personal attacks. Your fallacious assumption that I don't have a life is hilarious because I'm a fourth year college student, have two jobs, am quite involved with many activities and leadership roles.
How, exactly, are I depriving people of the freedom to worship by arguing that their religious ideas are false?
I never said that I was the most hated person I Wilkes-Barre. KRZ DJ Jumpin' Jeff Walker called me the third most hated person in Luzerne County. I wear this as a great badge of honor because it proves my point on so many levels. This demonstrates that religion is divisive as I have argued it is, moderates can be hateful people and part of the problem, people can turn their brains off when religion is involved, people lack critical thinking skills, and religion can do a great deal of harm. The nativity issue was a legal one, not a religious one. The arguments were and still are on my side and the courthouse officials even admitted they were wrong!
What do you mean "Leave the elderly alone?" All I am doing is upholding the law and voicing my opinions in the media, online, etc. I'm not knocking on doors handing out papers to people or anything like that. How can a dissenting opinion that is civil bother people so much if their beliefs are so substantiated, anyway? They should follow the advice in the Bible (1 Peter 3:15) and give arguments for their beliefs. How can a dissenter be such a bother in the face of God, if he exists?
I welcome disagreement on my blog, on my profile, and everywhere. If you don't agree, say so and dictate why. We can have a conversation instead of offering personal attacks, non-sequiters, etc.
It's also silly to suggest that I don't listen to the other side of the story because I listen (and post) debates from "the other side" and go to various religiously-themed events, and discuss these matters with other people frequently.
Thanks for brightening my day and proving my point!
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/68/please-sign---congressman-barletta-is-avoiding-his-constituents-we-are-demanding-a-augest-2011/
ReplyDelete