Pursuit of the truth requires more than imagination: it requires the generation and decisive elimination of alternative possibilities until, ideally, only one remains, and it requires a habitual readiness to attack one's own convictions.
- Thomas Nagel, The View From Nowhere

November 29, 2010

Are Atheists "Forcing Their Beliefs" on others?


I constantly hear the phrase "atheists are forcing their beliefs on others" from theists and even some atheists. I certainly can't speak for all atheists and what they might do to warrant this accusation from theists and other atheists, but this idea of "forcing beliefs" is utterly ridiculous.

What I do is blog, try to make people think, promote critical thinking and skepticism, and encourage intellectual honesty. No one is forced to read anything I type, listen to anything I have to say, or have any conversations with me. If a theist is going to make a wild claim around me, I'm most likely going to challenge it/ask for clarification/ask a question if the situation is warranted. If I ask a theist to answer a potentially "difficult" question like, "Do you think non-believers deserve to go to Hell" and then criticize them for not answering the question, I'm not "forcing" anything...I'm simply calling for intellectual honesty.

If people read my information, listen to what I have to say, or engage me in a conversation, what do they really have to lose? Understanding is had by discussion with others and engaging with others' ideas. If your religious belief is important to you and/or you are concerned about having as many justified beliefs as possible, your best bet is to engage the arguments of those who most fervently disagree with you.

Although many people might call me a "militant atheist" (another ridiculous phrase), I would like to think that I'm quite mild in presenting my information. I have discussions, blog, and challenge wild claims. Oh no! I'm not knocking on doors of theists or standing outside with a megaphone yelling "Belief in gods is irrational!" I'm not going to elementary schools and telling children that Santa Claus is a myth. I'm very much unlike people who actually do force their beliefs on children via indoctrination.

Adults, I would think, are primary consumers of my work. If I were to give a presentation to children, I would give a presentation on critical thinking and science that was age appropriate. Instead of "telling kids to be atheists," I would teach them how to think, not what to think. How many priests and leaders of religious school programs for little children can possibly say that? When I was younger, I was told that God was real on authority, not good reason. There are certainly some youth teachers out there who aren't indoctrinating and some Catholic schools that may have a non-indoctrination approach, but indoctrination is usually the name of the game.

Reading what I have to say won't force you to do anything...you might not even decide to think and might just turn the blinders on and ignore my arguments. You hear arguments, listen to advertisements, and are the target of persuasion in many areas of life. If you walk into a furniture store, for example, sales associates are going to try to persuade you to purchase furniture. Would you charge them with "forcing their beliefs" on you if they told you that a certain couch is a good buy? Would you ever tell a teacher who presents information about why evolution is true that he/she was "forcing beliefs" on you?

We're consumers of information and draw conclusions on our own accord. We [hopefully] don't just listen to what others say and uncritically accept everything they say. We look for flaws in arguments, we ask questions, and we make decisions. It's very clear that others don't force us to believe or not believe in certain propositions. We make decisions based on what we hear.

It's nonsensical for theists or atheists to charge atheists with "forcing their beliefs" on others. People come to their own conclusions and decide what is reasonable and what is not.

Claiming that atheists are forcing beliefs on others is ludicrous.

4 comments:

  1. Justin,
    I just read the story in the timesleader regarding the donation of religious articles to a church in Haiti. Your comment struck me as a visceral response to anything positive about religion. Under your sense of intellectual honestly one would sum life up as this: You're conceived, you're born(maybe) you live briefly or at most 120 years. During that period you respirate, take in nourishment to sustain your body which grows at first but then starts to decline then die. You may reproduce but that truly does nothing for you as an individual. It's purpose is to perpetuate the species. You may delude yourself to think that your unique perspective on existence if imparted to anyone who will listen will bring you some type of eternal memorialization in the minds of future generations but in reality your situation probably assures you your wisdom no matter how profound will be forgotten with a few years of your demise. Just like the fondness you feel for one of your great great grandparents and the words they passed down to your generation.
    If you think religious people are intellectually dishonest then that is your opinion. But in reality (which is the realm in which you operate) who really cares what you think. It will soon enough be forgotten.
    I do thank you however for giving me a brief moment to reflect on what I believe.I beleive your need to comment was directed to me by the Spirit. And Justin, I don't believe you are trying to force your belief on others. Don't get mad that I am going to pray for you that you someday see the joy that comes from the belief in God. My name is not important. I hope you got that point from my writing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anybody who calls you, Justin, a "militant atheist" has obviously never met one. You're as peaceful as activists can get.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Work is leading me to some extensive learning about formal verification & validation. A belief system (a model of some portion of reallity) must hold up under critical thinking / formal logic to be verified. Given a verified belief system one can attempt to validate through comparison with observations of reallity. The hard truth is that absolute validation is theoretically impossible, validation is necessarily contextual. A religion that doesn't stand up under verification should be fixed or discarded.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Claudia Wayne DubersteinMar 15, 2011 12:58 PM

    Justin, because you chose to post this on my wall, I will respond here.

    “Me think thinks you doth protest too much. “ One of the definitions of militant: an angry and militant speech

    I would also add BELLICOSE: favoring or inclined to start quarrels or wars.

    Other Synonyms: argumentative, confrontational, contentious, discordant, belligerent
    truculent, vitriolic. By almost every definition of the word you are militant. You may choose to reject the label, which is totally up to you. I will not demand, you justify your rejection, I will accept as your choice. Your militant demand that all must justify their belief to you is indicative of a very dictatorial nature. The simple and recommended answer to your Dictate is “I choose to.”

    ReplyDelete

Please Consider Donating

I update this site on a very frequent basis, am passionate about what I do, respond to comments from my readers and engage my audience, am very active beyond the keyboard, and am not in any sort of 'ivory tower.' Unfortunately, blogging is no full-time well-paying position by any means. If you enjoy my work and would like to donate something -- even a dollar that you would never miss -- as a sign of appreciation, I would be very appreciative. Thank you!